Long-term follow-up of balloon-expandable valves according to the implantation strategy: insight from the DIRECTAVI trial.

BACKGROUND: Safety and feasibility of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) without balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) using the SAPIEN 3 balloon-expandable device has been previously demonstrated. The impact on long-term valve hemodynamic performances and outcomes remains however unknown. We evaluate long-term clinical and hemodynamic results according to the implant strategy (direct TAVR vs BAV pre-TAVR) in patients included in the DIRECTAVI randomized trial (NCT02729519). METHODS: Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up until January 2023 was performed for all patients included in the DIRECTAVI trial since 2016 (n = 228). The primary endpoint was incidence of moderate/severe hemodynamic valve deterioration (HVD), according to the Valve Academic Research defined Consortium-3 criteria (increase in mean gradient ≥10 mmHg resulting in a final mean gradient ≥20 mmHg, or new/worsening aortic regurgitation of 1 grade resulting in ≥ moderate aortic regurgitation). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 3.8 (2.2-4.7) years. Mean age at follow-up was 87 ± 6.7 years. No difference in incidence of HVD in the direct implantation group compared to the BAV group was found (incidence of 1.97 per 100 person-years and 1.45 per 100 person-years, respectively, P = 0.6). Prevalence of predicted prothesis-patient mismatch was low (n = 13 [11.4%] in the direct TAVR group vs n = 15 [13.2%] in BAV group) and similar between both groups (P = .7). Major outcomes including death, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure and pacemaker implantation were similar between both groups, (P = .4, P = .7, P = .3, and P = .3 respectively). CONCLUSION: Direct implantation of the balloon-expandable device in TAVR was not associated with an increased risk of moderate/severe HVD or major outcomes up to 6-year follow-up. These results guarantee wide use of direct balloon-expandable valve implantation, when feasible. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05140317.

Flecainide to prevent atrial arrhythmia after patent foramen ovale closure Rationale and design of the randomized AFLOAT study.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial arrhythmia is the most common complication of patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure. The real incidence of post-PFO closure atrial arrhytmia and whether this complication can be prevented is unknown. METHODS/DESIGN: The Assessment of Flecainide to Lower the patent foramen Ovale closure risk of Atrial fibrillation or Tachycardia (AFLOAT) trial is a prospective, national, multicentre, randomized, open-label, superiority trial with a blind evaluation of all the endpoints (PROBE design). A total of 186 patients are randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio immediately after PFO closure to receive Flecainide (150 mg per day in a single sustained-release dose) for 6 months (Group 1), Flecainide (150 mg per day in a single sustained-release dose) for 3 months (Group 2), or no additional treatment (standard of care) for 6 months (Group 3). The primary endpoint is the percentage of patients with at least one episode of symptomatic or asymptomatic atrial arrhythmia episode (≥30s) recorded within 3 months after PFO closure on long-term monitoring with an insertable cardiac monitor. Whether 3 months of treatment is sufficient compared to 6 months will be analyzed as a secondary objective of the study. CONCLUSION: AFLOAT is the first trial to test the hypothesis that a short treatment with oral Flecainide can prevent the new-onset of atrial arrhythmia after PFO closure. Clinical trial registration: NCT05213104 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator Shortens the Lengths of Stay in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction after Myocardial Infarction: A Single-Centre Real-World Experience.

The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) has been proven to be effective in preventing sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients soon after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%. The aim of this study was to assess whether a WCD may shorten the length of an initial hospital stay (total length, days in the intensive care unit (ICU) and in the acute cardiac care unit (ACCU)) among these patients. This was a single-centre, retrospective observational study of patients referred for the management of SCD risk post-AMI and LVEF ≤35%, in a tertiary care hospital. The clinical characteristics and length of index hospitalization of the group of patients discharged, with or without WCD, were compared. A propensity score analysis was performed, then weighted regression models were conducted. A total of 101 patients in the WCD group and 29 in the control group were enrolled in the analysis. In the weighted regression models, WCD significantly reduced the days spent in ACCU (p < 0.001). WCD patients had significantly fewer days spent in ACCU (5.5 ± 2.6 vs. 8.4 ± 12.8 days, p < 0.001) and shorter hospitalizations (10.2 ± 5.7 vs. 13.4 ± 17.6 days, p = 0.005), compared with the control group. It was concluded that the WCD appears to reduce the total length of hospitalization and lengths of stay in ACCU for patients post-AMI and with left ventricular dysfunction.

Identification of Low- versus High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndrome for a Selective ECG Monitoring Strategy.

BACKGROUND: While admission of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in cardiology intensive care unit (CICU) is usual, in-hospital major outcomes in lower risk patients may be evaluated after early coronary angiography according to the European guidelines. METHODS: Consecutive ACS patients were prospectively included after coronary angiography evaluation within 24 h and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), when required. Patients were classified as high- or low-risk according to hemodynamics, rhythmic state, ischemic and bleeding risks. Major in-hospital outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: From January to June 2021, 277 patients were enrolled (62.8% with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n = 174); 37.2% with non-NSTEMI (NSTEMI) (n = 103). PCI was required for 260 patients (93.9%). Seventy-four patients (26.7%) were classified as low-risk (n = 47 NSTEMI; n= 27 STEMI) and 203 patients (73.3%) as high-risk of events. All patients were monitored in CICU. While 38 patients (18.7%) from the high-risk group reached the primary endpoint, mainly related to rhythmic or conduction disorder (n = 24, 11.8%) or unstable hemodynamics (n = 17; 8.4%), only 1 patient (1.3%) in the low-risk group had one major outcome (no fatal bleeding); p < 0.01. The negative predictive value of our patient stratification for the absence of major in-hospital outcome was 100% (CI95%: 100-100%) for STEMI and 97.9% [CI95%: 93.2-100%] for NSTEMI patients. CONCLUSIONS: Stratification of ACS patients after early coronary angiography and most of the time PCI, identify a population with very low risk of in-hospital events (1/4 of all ACS and 1/2 of NSTEMI) who may probably not require ECG monitoring and/or CICU admission. (NCT04378504).

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with uninterrupted vitamin K antagonists.

BACKGROUND: Bridging of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) with heparin is usually not promoted during interventional or surgical procedures related to increased risk of bleeding and thrombotic events but this strategy has not been evaluated during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of major bleeding and vascular complications after TAVI performed in patients with uninterrupted VKA. METHODS: From January 2016 to October 2017, consecutive patients who underwent TAVI with uninterrupted VKA (International Normalized Ratio [INR] between 1.5 and 3.5) were prospectively included in a monocentric registry. TAVI was performed according to current guidelines and a 50 U/kg bolus of heparin was injected at the beginning of the procedure for all patients. Vascular and bleeding complications were assessed using the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC3) and the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) definitions at a 30-day follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 88 patients were included with a median age of 84 years (81.8-87.0), 42% being female. The median society of thoracic surgeons score was 5.1 (4.1-7.5), the median CHADS2-VASc was 5.5 (5-6) and 60.2% had a chronic kidney failure. Median INR at the time of implantation was 2.1 (1.8-2.6). The main VKA indication was atrial fibrillation. Transfemoral access was used in 88.6% of the patients. Major bleeding (BARC ≥ 3b) occurred in five patients (5.7%) and major vascular complications occurred in seven patients (8.0%). At 1 month follow-up, major bleeding (BARC ≥ 3) or vascular complications occurred in 10 patients (11.4%). In patients with major bleeding peripheral arterial disease (RR = 10.95; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.63-73.75; p = 0.014) and carotid access (RR = 8.56; 95% CI 1.19-1.51; p = 0.033) were more common. INR > 2.5 was significantly associated with vascular complications (RR = 7.14; 95% CI 1.29-39.63; p = 0.025). At 30 days, mortality and stroke rates were 2.3% and 4.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: TAVI with uninterrupted VKA treatment seems feasible and safe with a low risk of major bleeding and vascular complications in this first single-center experience. Particular caution is advocated in high body mass index patients and to keep INR < 2.5.

Simplified TAVR Procedure: How Far Is It Possible to Go?

Increasing operators' experience and improvement of the technique have resulted in a drastic reduction in complications following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with lower surgical risk. In parallel, the procedure was considerably simplified, with a routine default approach including local anesthesia in the catheterization laboratory, percutaneous femoral approach, radial artery as the secondary access, prosthesis implantation without predilatation, left ventricle wire pacing and early discharge. Thus, the "simplified" TAVR adopted in most centers nowadays is a real revolution of the technique. However, simplified TAVR must be accompanied upstream by a rigorous selection of patients who can benefit from a minimalist procedure in order to guarantee its safety. The minimalist strategy must not become dogmatic and careful pre-, per- and post-procedural evaluation of patients with well-defined protocols guarantee optimal care following TAVR. This review aims to evaluate the benefits and limits of the simplified TAVR procedure in a current and future vision.

Vascular complications and bleeding after balloon aortic valvuloplasty performed with or without heparin: HEPAVALVE randomized study.

Background: Vascular and bleeding events remain the main complications after balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV). While BAV is usually performed with per procedural heparin injection, BAV performed without heparin may reduce hemorrhagic events. We aimed to determine whether vascular and bleeding complications may be reduced with BAV performed without heparin. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted from January 2013 to September 2016. Patients were randomly assigned to placebo or intravenous unfractionated heparin (UH) 50 IU/kg bolus during the procedure. The primary endpoint included major vascular, bleeding and ischemic complications (stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction) according to VARC-2 criteria. Results: Among 89 randomized patients, 82 completed the study (n = 39 in the UH group and n = 43 in the placebo group). At baseline, diabetes, sex male and renal failure were more frequent in the UH group and peripheral artery disease was more frequent in the placebo group. The primary endpoint was achieved in 7 patients (8.5%), 1 in the placebo group (2.3%) versus 6 in the UH group (15.4%). After adjustment on diabetes, sex, renal failure, peripheral artery disease, percutaneous closure device and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, UH utilization was associated with a significant risk of major vascular, bleeding and ischemic complications (primary endpoint) (adjOR: 11.9; 95%CI: 1.2-117.2; p = 0.03). Hospitalization length was lower in the placebo group compared to the UH group (p = 0.03). Conclusions: BAV without per procedural UH was associated with a reduction of major VC and bleeding events without increasing the ischemic risk and with a shorter hospitalization length.

Evolution of right ventricular dysfunction and tricuspid regurgitation after TAVI: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) may impact prognosis of patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). We aimed to evaluate the evolution of previous RV dysfunction and/or significant TR after TAVI procedure. METHODS: All patients undergoing TAVI between January 2018 and January 2019 were enrolled in this prospective cohort. Patients with at least one right heart (RH) abnormality at baseline including RV dysfunction (TAPSE < 17 mm, S-wave < 9.5 cm/s, Fractional area change < 35%, Strain > -20%, Tei > 0.54) and/or significant TR (Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area ≥ 40 mm2 and/or Regurgitant Volume ≥ 45 mL) underwent transthoracic echocardiography at day 1 and 6-month after TAVI. The primary endpoint was the regression of pre-TAVI RV dysfunction and/or significant TR at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: The study enrolled 144 patients including 76 women (52.8%) with a mean age of 81.1 ± 6.8 yo, a mean EuroSCORE 2 of 5.2 ± 3.9%. At least one RH abnormality was observed in 53 patients (36.8%). At 6-month, at least one RV dysfunction parameter significantly improved in 26 patients (63.4%), TAPSE increasing from 13.0 ± 2.6 to 16.0 ± 9.8 mm, p < 0.0001 and S-wave from 7.7 ± 1.2 to 10.0 ± 2.6 cm/s, p = 0.004. Among 31 patients with baseline significant TR, TR decreased in 14 (45.2%); p = 0.003. Among patients with baseline RH abnormalities, 13 (24.5%) fully recovered. Baseline significant TR was predictive of 6-month clinical outcomes (OR = 3.1, 95%CI = [1.01-9.0], p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In our recent intermediate surgical risk TAVI population, RV dysfunction and/or significant TR are frequent at baseline and fully or partially recover in most patients at 6-month follow-up.

Colchicine to Prevent Sympathetic Denervation after an Acute Myocardial Infarction: The COLD-MI Trial Protocol.

Inflammatory processes are deeply involved in ischemia-reperfusion injuries (IRI) and ventricular remodelling (VR) after a ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). They are associated with clinical adverse events (heart failure and cardiovascular death) adding damage to the myocardium after reperfusion. Moreover, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) induces a local sympathetic denervation leading to electrical instability and arrythmia. Colchicine, a well-known alkaloid with direct anti-inflammatory effects, was shown to reduce the myocardial necrosis size and limit the VR. In a recent proof of concept study, colchicine appears to prevent sympathetic denervation in a mice model of ischemia/reperfusion, but not in the necrosis or in the border zone areas. The Colchicine to Prevent Sympathetic Denervation after an AMI study (COLD-MI) is an ongoing, confirmative, prospective, monocentre, randomized, open-label trial. The COLD-MI trial aims to evaluate the intensity of sympathetic denervation after AMI and its potential modulation due to low dose colchicine. Sympathetic denervation will be noninvasively evaluated using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). After a first episode of STEMI (Initial TIMI flow ≤ 1) and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), patients will be randomized (n = 56) in a 1:1 ratio to either receive colchicine or not for 30 days. The primary end point will be the percentage of myocardial denervation measured by 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) SPECT at a 6-month follow-up. The main secondary end points will be basic ECG parameters (QRS duration, corrected QT) and HRV parameters from a 24 hour-recording Holter at 1- and 6-months follow-up. Results from this study will contribute to a better understanding of the cardioprotective effect of colchicine after AMI. The present study describes the rationale, design, and methods of the trial.

Conception and bicentric validation of the proSCANNED score, a simplified bedside prognostic score for Heart Failure patients.

A simple and accurate prognostic tool for Heart Failure (HF) patients is critical to improve follow-up. Different risk scores are accurate but with limited clinical applicability. The current study aims to derive and validate a simple predictive tool for HF prognosis. French outpatients with stable HF of two university hospitals were included in the derivation (N = 134) or in the validation (N = 274) sample and followed up for a median of 23 months. Potential predictors were variables with known association with mortality and easily available. The proSCANNED risk score was derived using a parametric survival model on complete case data; it includes 8 binary variables and its values are 0-8. In the validation sample, the ability of the score to discriminate the 1-year vital status was moderate (AUC = 0.71, IC95% = [0.64-0.71]). However, the stratification of the score in three groups showed a good calibration for patients in the low- and medium-risk risk group. The proSCANNED score is an easy-to-use tool in clinical practice with a good discrimination, stability, and calibration sufficient to improve the medical care of patients. Other follow up studies are necessary to assess score applicability in larger populations, and its impact.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement performed with selective telemetry monitoring: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Telemetry monitoring (TM) with or without intensive care unit (ICU) admission is the standard of care after Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Regarding to improvements of the technique and procedural results, TM may be considered only in selected patients. We aimed to confirm feasibility and safety of selective TM in patients undergoing TAVR. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 449 consecutive patients undergoing TAVR. Patients were transferred to general cardiology ward (GCW) without TM after the procedure when stable clinical state, transfemoral access, no baseline right bundle branch block (RBBB), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 40%, and no complication including any electrocardiogram (ECG) change within 1 h after the procedure ("low-risk" group). Others patients were considered for TM in ICU ("high-risk" group). The primary endpoint evaluated in-hospital major adverse events after unit admission according to VARC-2 criteria. RESULTS: The mean age was 81.8 ± 7.5 years and mean EuroSCORE II was 7.5 ± 4.8%. In total, 116 patients (25.8%) were considered as "low-risk" patients and 163 patients (36.3%) were referred to GCW, including those with immediate pacemaker implantation. A total of 96 patients (21.3%) reached the primary endpoint including mainly conductive disorders (12.8%). No major adverse events, particularly no late severe conductive disorder, occurred in the "low-risk" group (negative predictive value of 100%). Baseline RBBB (p < 0.01), LVEF < 40% (p = 0.02) and "high-risk" group (p < 0.01) were predictive of outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Using rigorous periprocedural selection criteria, patients' admission in GCW without TM can be routinely and safely performed in 1/3 of patients after TAVR.

Transcarotid versus transfemoral access in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with complex aortofemoral anatomy.

AIMS: While major vascular complications (MVC) remains an issue after Transfemoral (TF) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), we compared outcomes in TF versus transcarotid (TC) approaches in patients with complex vascular anatomy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among patients undergoing TAVR in our center between 2015 and 2018, we evaluated patients with complex vascular anatomy defined on CT scan as: (a) iliofemoral diameter between 5.5 and 6 mm or <6.5 mm with severe calcifications or tortuosity AND/OR (b) abdominal aorta pathology. The primary endpoint included access failure, mortality, MVC, major bleeding and stroke at 1-month. Among 483 patients, 131 (31.2%) with complex vascular anatomy underwent TF (n = 51;39.2%) or TC (n = 80;60.8%) TAVR. The mean age was 81.7 ± 6.9. TC group had higher STS score (p = .01), higher incidence of coronary artery disease (p = .04) and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (p < .001). In TC group, primary endpoint occurred twice less without reaching significance compared to TF group (n = 8; 10.0% vs. n = 10; 19.6% respectively; p = .1). Incidence of MVC was higher in TF group (11.8 vs. 1.3% in the TC group; p = .01) with similar incidence of stroke between groups (p = .8). CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher patient risk profile, TC approach in complex aortofemoral anatomy provides similar favorable outcomes with less MVC compared to TF approach.

Myocardial Injury After Balloon Predilatation Versus Direct Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the DIRECTAVI Trial.

Background Myocardial injury is associated with higher mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and might be increased by prior balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV). We aimed to evaluate the impact of prior BAV versus direct prosthesis implantation on myocardial injury occurring after (TAVR) with balloon-expandable prostheses. Methods and Results The DIRECTAVI (Direct Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) trial, an open-label randomized study, demonstrated noninferiority of TAVR without BAV (direct TAVR group) compared with systematic BAV (BAV group) with the Edwards SAPIEN 3 valve. High-sensitivity troponin was assessed before and the day after the procedure. Incidence of myocardial injury after the procedure (high-sensitivity troponin elevation >15× the upper reference limit [14 ng/L]) was the main end point. Impact of myocardial injury on 1-month adverse events (all-cause mortality, stroke, major bleeding, major vascular complications, transfusion, acute kidney injury, heart failure, pacemaker implantation, and aortic regurgitation) was evaluated. Preprocedure and postprocedure high-sensitivity troponin levels were available in 211 patients. The mean age of patients was 83 years (78-87 years), with 129 men (61.1%). Mean postprocedure high-sensitivity troponin was 124.9±81.4 ng/L in the direct TAVR group versus 170.4±127.7 ng/L in the BAV group (P=0.007). Myocardial injury occurred in 42 patients (19.9%), including 13 patients (12.2%) in the direct TAVR group and 29 (27.9%) in the BAV group (P=0.004). BAV increased by 2.8-fold (95% CI, 1.4-5.8) myocardial injury probability. Myocardial injury was associated with 1-month adverse events (P=0.03). Conclusions BAV increased the incidence and magnitude of myocardial injury after TAVR with new-generation balloon-expandable valves. Myocardial injury was associated with 1-month adverse events. These results argue in favor of direct SAPIEN 3 valve implantation. Registration URL: https://www.Clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02729519.

Post resuscitation electrocardiogram for coronary angiography indication after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: Coronary angiography is the standard of care after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA), but its benefit for patients without persistent ST-segment elevation (STE) remains controversial. METHODS: All patients admitted for coronary angiography after a resuscitated OHCA were consecutively included in this prospective study. Three patient groups were defined according to post-resuscitation ECG: STE or new left bundle branch block (LBBB) (group 1); other ST/T repolarization disorders (group 2) and no repolarisation disorders (group 3). The proportion and predictive factors of an acute coronary lesion, defined by acute coronary occlusion or thrombotic lesion or lesion associated with flow impairment, were evaluated according to different groups as well as thirty-day mortality. RESULTS: Among 129 consecutive patients: 62 (48.1%), 30 (23.3%) and 30 (23.3%) patients were included in groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively. An acute coronary lesion was observed in 43% (n = 55) of patients, mainly in group 1 (n = 44, 70.9%). Initial coronary TIMI 0/1 flow was more frequently observed in group 1 than in group 2 (n = 25, 40.3% vs n = 1, 3.3%) and never in group 3. Chest pain and STE or new LBBB were independently associated with an acute coronary lesion (adj. OR = 7.14 [1.85-25.00]; p = 0.004 and adj. OR = 11.10 [3.70-33.33]; p < 0.001 respectively). In absence of any repolarization disorders, acute coronary lesion or occlusion were excluded with negative predictive values of 93.3% and 100% respectively. The one-month survival rate was 38.8% and was better in patients among the group 1 compared to those from the 2 other groups (n = 28, 45.2% vs n = 21, 35%, respectively; p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Considering the high negative predictive value of post-resuscitation ECG to exclude acute coronary lesion and occlusion after OHCA, a delayed coronary angiography appears a reliable alternative for patients without repolarization disorders.

Prior Balloon Valvuloplasty Versus Direct Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From the DIRECTAVI Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate device success of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using new-generation balloon-expandable prostheses with or without balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV). BACKGROUND: Randomized studies are lacking comparing TAVR without BAV against the conventional technique of TAVR with BAV. METHODS: DIRECTAVI (Direct Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) was an open-label noninferiority study that randomized patients undergoing TAVR using the Edwards SAPIEN 3 valve with or without prior balloon valvuloplasty. The primary endpoint was the device success rate according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria, which was evaluated using a 7% noninferiority margin. The secondary endpoint included procedural and 30-day adverse events. RESULTS: Device success was recorded for 184 of 236 included patients (78.0%). The rate of device success in the direct implantation group (n = 97 [80.2%]) was noninferior to that in the BAV group (n = 87 [75.7%]) (mean difference 4.5%; 95% confidence interval: -4.4% to 13.4%; p = 0.02 for noninferiority). No severe prosthesis-patient mismatch or severe aortic regurgitation occurred in any group. In the direct implantation group, 7 patients (5.8%) required BAV to cross the valve. Adverse events were related mainly to pacemaker implantation (20.9% in the BAV group vs. 19.0% in the direct implantation group; p = 0.70). No significant difference was found between the 2 strategies in duration of procedure, contrast volume, radiation exposure, or rate of post-dilatation. CONCLUSIONS: Direct TAVR without prior BAV was noninferior to the conventional strategy using BAV with new-generation balloon-expandable valves, but without procedural simplification. BAV was needed to cross the valve in a few patients, suggesting a need for upstream selection on the basis of patient anatomy. (TAVI Without Balloon Predilatation [of the Aortic Valve] SAPIEN 3 [DIRECTAVI]; NCT02729519).

Drug Coated Balloon-Only Strategy in De Novo Lesions of Large Coronary Vessels.

OBJECTIVES: We analyzed the efficacy of drug coated balloons (DCB) as a stand-alone-therapy in de novo lesions of large coronary arteries. DCBs seem to be an attractive alternative for the stent-free interventional treatment of de novo coronary artery disease (CAD). However, data regarding a DCB-only approach in de novo CAD are currently limited to vessels of small caliber. METHODS: By means of propensity score (PS) matching 234 individuals with de novo CAD were identified with similar demographic characteristics. This patient population was stratified in a 1:1 fashion according to a reference vessel diameter cut-off of 2.75 mm in small and large vessel disease. The primary endpoint was the rate of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 9 months. RESULTS: Patients with small vessel disease had an average reference diameter of 2.45 ± 0.23 mm, while the large vessel group averaged 3.16 ± 0.27 mm. Regarding 9-month major adverse cardiac event (MACE), 5.7% of the patients with small and 6.1% of the patients with large vessels had MACE (p=0.903). Analysis of the individual MACE components revealed a TLR rate of 3.8% in small and 1.0% in large vessels (p=0.200). Of note, no thrombotic events in the DCB treated coronary segments occurred in either group during the 9-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate for the first time that DCB-only PCI of de novo lesions in large coronary arteries (>2.75 mm) is safe and as effective. Interventional treatment for CAD without permanent or temporary scaffolding, demonstrated a similar efficacy for large and small vessels.

Effects of remote ischemic conditioning on kidney injury in at-risk patients undergoing elective coronary angiography (PREPARE study): a multicenter, randomized clinical trial.

The ability of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) following percutaneous coronary angiography in at-risk patients is controversial. No evidence exists regarding potential RIPC positive effects on renal function and clinical outcomes in the long-term. The PREPARE study was a randomized, prospective, multicenter, and double-blinded trial. A total of 222 patients scheduled for coronary angiography and/or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 40 mL/min/1.73 m2, or eGFR between 40 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and two further risk factors were allocated to RIPC or control groups. Preventive measures were applied to all patients, including continuous intravenous saline infusion, withdrawal of nephrotoxic drugs, and limited volume of contrast medium. The primary endpoint, namely incidence of CIN, was 3.8% in the control group and 5.1% in the RIPC group (p = 0.74). The secondary endpoints, i.e., changes in serum creatinine and eGFR levels from baseline to 48 hours and from baseline to 12 months following contrast medium exposure, did not differ between both groups. The incidences of all major clinical events at 12 months were similar in both groups. In this population at risk of CIN, preventive strategies were associated with low CIN incidence. RIPC impacted neither the CIN incidence nor both the renal function and clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up.

Hemodynamic Performances and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Valve-in-Valve Versus Native Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) emerged has a less invasive treatment than surgery for patients with degenerated bioprosthesis. However, few data are currently available regarding results of ViV versus TAVI in native aortic valve. We aimed to compare hemodynamic performances and 1-year outcomes between patients who underwent ViV procedure and patients who underwent non-ViV TAVI. This bicentric study included all patients who underwent aortic ViV procedure for surgical bioprosthetic aortic failure between 2013 and 2017. All patients who underwent TAVI were included in the analysis during the same period. ViV and non-ViV patients were matched with 1:2 ratio according to size, type of TAVI device, age (±5 years), sex, and STS score. Primary end point was hemodynamic performance including mean aortic gradient and aortic regurgitation at 1-year follow-up. A total of 132 patients were included, 49 in the ViV group and 83 in the non-ViV group. Mean age was 82.8 ± 5.9 years, 55.3% were female. Mean STS score was 5.2% ± 3.1%. Self-expandable valves were implanted in 78.8% of patients. At 1-year follow-up, aortic mean gradient was significantly higher in ViV group (18.1 ± 9.4 mm Hg vs 11.4 ± 5.4 mm Hg; p < 0.0001) and 17 (38.6%) patients had a mean aortic gradient ≥20 mm Hg vs 6 (7.8%) in the non-ViV group (p = 0.0001). Aortic regurgitation > grade 2 were similar in both groups (p = 0.71). In the ViV group, new pacemaker implantation was less frequent (p = 0.01) and coronary occlusions occurred only in ViV group (n = 2 [4.1%]). At 1-year follow-up, 3 patients (2.3%) died from cardiac cause, 1 (2.1%) in the ViV group vs 2 (2.4%) in the non-ViV group (p = 0.9). There was no stroke. In conclusion, compared with TAVI in native aortic stenosis, ViV appears as a safe and feasible strategy in patients with impaired bioprosthesis. As 1-year hemodynamic performances seem better in native TAVI procedure, long-term follow-up should be assessed to determinate the impact of residual stenosis on outcomes and durability.

Which high-sensitivity troponin variable best characterizes infarct size and microvascular obstruction?

BACKGROUND: The link between hs-Tn and infarct size has already been proved in several articles. However few is known about the kinetic of the troponin and its link to the infarct characteristics, likewise MVO. Our primary objective was to study which hs-Tn characterizes the best infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 29 consecutive STEMI patients to study. The kinetics of hs-TnT (Roche) and two different TnIs (hs-TnI from Abbott, s-TnI from Siemens) were evaluated for all patients. Area under curves (AUC), first peak (FP) and second peak (SP), for hs-TnT, were compared to IS and MVO size using contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance. For IS, statistically SP of hs-TnT presented the best correlation compared to other peak values [r=0.9 vs. 0.73 for FP hs-TnT; vs. 0.69 for hs-TnI; vs. 0.57 for s-TnI; respectively P<0.01, P<0.01, P<0.01]. For MVO size, statistically SP of hs-TnT presented the best correlation compared to other peak values [r=0.84 vs. 0.75 for FP hs-TnT; vs. 0.72 for hs-TnI; vs. 0.62 for s-TnI; respectively P=0.01, P<0.01, P<0.01]. The best AUC were archived by the hs-TnT (AUC=0.95) but there were no statistical differences when compared to other hs-Tn AUC. CONCLUSION: The SP of hs-TnT had the greatest level of correlation and therefore seems to be the best biological parameter to evaluate and characterize infarct size.